Archive for the ‘Anti-Americanism’ Category

Where will the left stand on this one?

Tuesday, July 14th, 2009

Up until now the radical left has framed the “war on terror” as an excuse to perpetuate American aggression, and they have argued the attacks of 9/11 and other terrorist acts around the world were a response to brash historical American Imperialism. There are many documented cases of western leftists actually stating that the Americans deserved what they got, or at least “had it coming” on 9/11.

Now Al-Qaeda has threatened China over it’s treatment of the Uighurs in the past week:

A group called al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb (AQM) is threatening attacks on the 50,000 Chinese workers in Algeria, according to a report prepared by international risk consultants Sterling Assynt and revealed in the South China Morning Post Tuesday.

The Chinese government is taking its first threat from Osama bin Laden’s deadly network seriously. Foreign Ministry spokesman Qin Gang told reporters: “We will keep a close eye on developments and make joint efforts with relevant countries to take all necessary measures to ensure the safety of overseas Chinese institutions and people.”

Clearly, these new threats of terrorism from al-Qaeda are unrelated to past acts of American Imperial aggression, so I am very curious to see how the radical left will respond to this new conflict.

We’ve seen in the past that demonstrations of outrage by the left have usually been reserved for conflicts that involve America or Israel, while they turn a blind eye to more universal issues such as freedom of speech, human rights, and gender equality. (Is it just me, or has the left been completely mum on the recent developments in Iran?)

Perhaps this time the left will side with the right – but since there’s no opportunity for America-bashing, I’m not holding my breath.

—-

It’s interesting that, while I’m highlighting the hypocrisy and the double standard displayed by the left, Tarek Fatah, in the National Post takes aim at the double standard of the Muslim world.

—-
Related: From an article in The Hamilton Spectator, November 27, 2008, Tahir Aslam Gora writes:

Ironically, writers such as Salman Rushdie, Ayaan Hirsi Ali, Taslima Nasreen and Irshad Manji are the targets of these so-called leftists as well. These are the writers who have claimed their liberation from Islamic suffocation by putting their lives at risk. But they never get recognized by the hard-core left, which doesn’t behave any differently than fanatic Islamic clerics.

—-

In a related article, Clifford May writes:

Ask those on the left what values they champion, and they will say equality, tolerance, women’s rights, gay rights, workers rights and human rights. Militant Islamists oppose all that, not infrequently through the application of lethal force. So how does one explain the burgeoning left-Islamist alliance?

Source.

The Hypocrisy File – It’s not bad if liberals do it.

Thursday, July 2nd, 2009

Victor Davis Hanson takes a look at what’s behind the liberal/conservative double standard when it comes to morality and hypocrisy.

So, then, what accounts for the hypocrisies?

Is there some generic, overarching explanation that accounts for the lopsided charge of hypocrisy?

I think we must go back to the nature of the liberal, egalitarian mind that professes the greater care for the welfare of the commons. In contrast, the conservative, the Republican, the libertarian, in dog-eat-dog fashion believes that life is sort of a tragic free-for-all, and to the victor goes the spoils, who then by his own sense of right must help the poorer and less well off. The latter are less sensitive, less caring, more goal orientated; the former are mellower, more sharing, and pit the power of ideas, morality, and fairness against the overwhelming power of money and influence.

Presto! The beleaguered, more moral liberal must be given greater leeway, even can employ sometimes questionable means, since his ends are the more exalted. Yes, Al Gore gets to fly private, and have a few extra rooms in his mansion, but he is in pain, sacrificing on the planet’s behalf, and needs a more ample footprint than the rest of us to save us from ourselves.

Source.

Quote of the day

Friday, April 24th, 2009

On the 9/11 “Truth” movement:

Across North America (never mind Europe and North America), millions of people have decided that the leaders of the free world are actually murderers — or, at least, in league with murderers – who’d wantonly slaughter thousands of their own citizens as a means to advance a geopolitical agenda. Isn’t that something that should interest us?

Jonathan Kay, April 23, 2009

Signs of progress in Afghanistan

Saturday, April 18th, 2009

I am getting very tired of hearing the naysayers repeat the familiar and lazy chorus that the culture of oppression in Afghanistan “will never change”. These same naysayers like to question whether we in the west have any business “exporting” our values and “imposing” them on a foreign land.

These arguments provide a convenient way to help justify pulling out of Afghanistan, turning our backs on a country that has demonstrated a real desire to join the ranks of free and democratic countries.

I do agree that change must come about from a desire within Afghanistan, and it’s apparent that this desire is very much alive and well:

When I lived in Kabul, women simply did not rise up, take to the streets, and mount brave demonstrations. Hell no. Wealthy women wore decorous long headscarves, long coats, and gloves, and were driven around by chauffeurs in expensive European cars. Poor women wore the full burq’a and were forced to sit separately from men on public buses; they were also kicked to the back of the line in the bazaar when the male servants of wealthy families came to make their purchases. Occasionally, if a country girl or woman was out working or walking and a male non-relative chanced by, she would swiftly, shyly turn her face away and simultaneously cover it with her headscarf. This was a practiced, perhaps terrified motion.

Imagine my joy today, nearly fifty years later, when I read that Afghan women just took to the streets to protest a new law which legalizes rape within marriage, requires a husband’s permission in order for his wife to be able to work, and requires wives to “dress” as their husbands desire.

Source: Phyllis Chesler, April 16th, 2009

Quote of the day

Wednesday, March 25th, 2009

Canadians increasingly seem to have sacrificed national self-esteem to international self-definition, believing we don’t really matter unless our actions are validated by external opinion or exposure.

Don Martin, March 24, 2009

“Democracy” at work in Venezuela

Tuesday, February 17th, 2009

Mr. Chavez, who has been in power for 10 years and vows to rule for decades, pledged to repay his poor backers for Sunday’s victory by combatting their No. 1 concern — crime that has given the OPEC nation one of the world’s worst murder rates.

The fragmented opposition, which was spearheaded by an inexperienced and underfinanced student movement, said the former paratrooper’s win was secured with huge government funding and blanket state television coverage.

“Another sham” was the editorial headline of leading opposition newspaper El Nacional, which complained that Venezuela’s electoral commission favored “a military regime that promotes hatred and divides Venezuela in two halves.”

Source.

Does anyone expect Hugo Chavez will ever relinquish power peacefully? Venezuela is sliding into the darkness, and will soon be joining the likes of Cuba and North Korea, whose people suffer under the oppression of a dictator who will use any means necessary to cling to power.

And of course, America will be to blame.

The Hypocrisy File – It’s not bad if liberals do it.

Tuesday, February 3rd, 2009

Inspired by the recent Presidential election campaign south of the border, along with my long-time interest in pointing out blatant examples of political hypocrisy, I bring you the first installment of the “Hypocrisy File”.

The other glimmer of Liberal hope is political weaponry they have purchased from the Barack Obama campaign.

Specifically, they’ve purchased computer programs and donor-targeting technology at a discount from the friendly U.S. Democrats and plan to unleash hundreds of gigabytes at crafting a master list of donors while combing the country for new support.

Source.

Let’s now recall how the Liberals virtually based their entire 2003 smear campaign on the mere suggestion that Stephen Harper had been helped by those nasty Americans in his leadership bid.

“Who paid for Stephen Harper’s rise to the head of the party?” asks the voice. “We don’t know. He refuses to reveal his donors. What do you suppose he’s hiding? We do know he’s very popular with right wingers in the U.S. They have money, maybe they helped him. We just don’t know. He just won’t say.”

Source.

Update: Not to be outdone by the Liberals, the NDP have have climbed abord the hypocrisy train.

CUPE asks that Israeli professors be blacklisted

Tuesday, January 6th, 2009

This news release really had me shaking my head:

CUPE Ontario to recommend support for ban on Israeli academics in response to Gaza bombings

TORONTO, Jan. 2 /CNW Telbec/ – CUPE Ontario’s university workers committee will bring a resolution to its annual conference supporting a ban on Israeli academics doing speaking, teaching or research work at Ontario universities as a protest against the December 29 bombing of the Islamic University in Gaza.
“In response to an appeal from the Palestinian Federation of Unions of University Professors and Employees, we are ready to say Israeli academics should not be on our campuses unless they explicitly condemn the university bombing and the assault on Gaza in general,” said Sid Ryan, president of CUPE Ontario. “It’s a logical next step, building on policy adopted by our provincial convention in 2006.”
Resolution 50, adopted in May 2006, supported boycotts, divestment and sanctions aimed at bringing about the Israeli withdrawal from occupied territories and a just peace in the region.
“Clearly, international pressure on Israel must increase to stop the massacre that is going on daily,” said Janice Folk-Dawson, chair of the CUPE Ontario University Workers Coordinating Committee, whose conference is scheduled for February. “We are proud to add CUPE voices to others from around the world saying enough is enough.”
Ryan and other CUPE representatives will join in the demonstration against the Israeli assault on Gaza at 2:00 p.m. tomorrow, Saturday, January 3 at Dundas Square in Toronto.

For further information: Sid Ryan, President, CUPE Ontario, (416)
209-0066; Pat Daley, CUPE Communications, (416) 616-6142

Source.

The suggestion that individuals must hold a particular opinion regarding a very complex and divisive issue, or lose their job is completely outrageous, and this public statement tells me all I need to know about the leadership of CUPE.

I would like someone to tell me when in history has any individual been singled out and asked to make a public statement of “outrage” based on their nation of origin? Sid Ryan has lost his mind.

Update: It looks like Hugo Chavez is getting in on the act, issuing this statement today:
“Now I hope that the Venezuelan Jewish community speaks out against this barbarism. Do it. Don’t you strongly reject all acts of persecution?” Chavez said. Source.

Quote of the day

Sunday, January 4th, 2009

How does a liberal or a leftist justify supporting a regime of religious fanatics whose ideology, when examined, is in complete contra-distinction to everything they claim they stand for?

Roger L. Simon

Well said Canada

Tuesday, November 25th, 2008

A disappointing resolution dealing with the protection of religious rights and freedom of speech appears to be moving forward at the United Nations.

While the resolution itself reflects the increasingly dysfunctional nature of the U.N. makeup, I was pleased to read about Canada’s opposition to the resolution and defense of individual rights:

Canada and other Western countries emphasize the distinction between granting an “idea” rights – and defending the right of people not to be discriminated against.

“Canada rejects the basic premise that religions have rights; human rights belong to human beings,” said Catherine Loubier, spokeswoman for Foreign Affairs Minister Lawrence Cannon.

“The focus [here] should not be on protecting religions, but rather on protecting the rights of the adherents of religions, including of people belonging to religious minorities, or people who may choose to change their religion, or not to practice religion at all.”

Muslim countries say they are only trying to cut down of what they see as extensive bias against Islam in the Western world. In the lead-up to Monday’s vote, many referred, for example, to the 2005 publication of Danish cartoons that satirized Muhammad, and which touched off riots through the Muslim world.

Source.