Archive for the ‘Anti-Americanism’ Category

Remembering the FLQ

Wednesday, September 9th, 2009

There has been much debate recently about the events being planned to celebrate the 250th anniversary of the Battle of the Plains of Abraham. Perhaps most controversial is the decision by organisers to include a reading of the 1970 FLQ Manifesto. This decision has the support of the National Post editorial board, which writes:

The FLQ Manifesto is undeniably part of Quebec’s history. It is a text that evokes a particular time — one that, in fact, does so splendidly, evoking the feverish, fetid atmosphere of the late Sixties with a suddenness and a brutality that makes one glad those days were so long ago. It is perfectly proper that the manifesto should be recited as part of a general airing of important historical texts, as it was once recited to help save the life of James Cross, the still-living British diplomat kidnapped by the Front de liberation du Quebec on Oct. 5, 1970.

Source.

I too, support the argument that we must not forget our past.

To understand the FLQ and it’s violent actions, it’s important to first understand the ideology they were loyal to. The FLQ were first and foremost a radical Marxist movement. For the FLQ and most Marxist groups, the primary objective is to defeat capitalism – using any means possible. For the FLQ, the goal of Quebec sovereignty provided the “noble” cover to their part in the much wider global struggle against capitalism.

Much of the FLQ Manifesto reads as though it were lifted directly out of Marx’s A Communist Manifesto:

We are the workers of Québec and we will continue to the bitter end. We want to replace the slave society with a free society, functioning by itself and for itself; a society open to the world.

Our struggle can only lead to victory. You cannot hold an awakening people in misery and contempt indefinitely. Long live Free Québec!

Long live our imprisoned political comrades. Long live the Québec revolution!

Long live the Front de liberation du Québec.

In addition to capitalism, the other enemy of Marxism is organised religion. In this passage the FLQ takes a swipe at both enemies in one sentence:

We are terrorized by the capitalist Roman church, even though this seems less and less obvious (who owns the property on which the stock exchange stands?)

In fact, there is very little reference to Quebec as a “distinct society” in the FLQ Manifesto. Instead it is quite clearly a call for “workers” to rise up against their “bosses”. Quebec nationalism is merely a smokescreen.

This pattern of seeking out what appear to be noble causes can been seen throughout history in the Marxist battle against capitalism. The most recent example of this wolf in sheep’s clothing is the battle over how to deal with climate change, which is rather ironic considering the environment records of the communist world.

While the FLQ now appears to be a historical footnote, it’s important to understand that it’s underpinnings are still very much alive and kicking today.

America, I thought we were friends?

Saturday, August 29th, 2009

While the domestic policies of the Obama administration have been dominating most of the headlines since his inauguration, raising very real concern and even dissent at home, foreign policy has quietly been taking shape behind the scenes. While Americans focus on the spectacle of a ballooning deficit as it’s government has taken unprecedented steps to control of the banking, automotive, and healthcare sectors, other countries have been asking the question “What does this administration mean to us?”

A month ago, the heroic leaders of Eastern Europe got down on their knees and begged Obama not to renege on George W. Bush’s promise to give them a missile defense system and not to give in to Russian threats and remonstrations, which were obviously designed to keep the former Soviet slave states within Russia’s imperial reach. Having seen Russian tanks rolling into Georgia, who can doubt that the Putin regime has long-term goals of reacquiring the “sphere of influence” that brought so much terror and loss of life to Eastern Europe just a few decades ago?

Source.

With the financial means to exert meaningful influence on the international stage now significantly compromised by out-of-control domestic spending programs, combined with this administration’s apparent desire to apologize for past “American imperialist sins”, historical Western allies do have reason for concern.

—-

Update: Eastern European concerns go unheard:

WARSAW, Poland – Poles and Czechs voiced deep concern Friday at President Barack Obama’s decision to scrap a Bush-era missile defense shield planned for their countries.

“Betrayal! The U.S. sold us to Russia and stabbed us in the back,” the Polish tabloid Fakt declared on its front page.

Polish President Lech Kaczynski said he was concerned that Obama’s new strategy leaves Poland in a dangerous “gray zone” between Western Europe and the old Soviet sphere.

Source.

David Horowitz – “No prisoners”

Thursday, August 27th, 2009

I’m just finishing the David Horowitz autobiography “Radical Son“, and as I make my way through page after page of historical references that have shaped the last 70 years of political and cultural activism in the west, I can’t help thinking how important this book is. Even though the book was written 12 years ago, many of those among his cast of characters are very much a part of the political landscape today. Perhaps more importantly, the forces that shaped these characters remain as strong as ever.

If you haven’t already done so, you really should read this book.

David Horowitz recently turned 70. Below is a video from his birthday celebration and “roast”. There are some excellent clips of some of his admirers that spoke at the dinner, but hearing him speak of his own journey is certainly the highlight:

A remarkable admission from the left

Friday, August 21st, 2009

The following point cannot be stressed enough; whilst the U.S. remains in Afghanistan, economic and social development will not occur much beyond current levels. This in turn means that the Taliban, as a broad-based movement of poor farmers and lower clergy, is the face of anti-imperialist resistance in Afghanistan for the foreseeable future.

To put it another way, if we, as avowed anti-imperialists, intend to wait around for a resistance movement that agrees with us on every issue, including the need to fight the oppression of women, gays, racial and religious minorities, etc., we’ll be waiting a long time. The Taliban is the resistance in Afghanistan and we must support it, critically, but unreservedly.

Source.

In previous posts I have wondered out loud about the silence of the left on issues of women’s rights and democratic reform in the middle east and elsewhere, and I have always maintained that the real struggle of the radical left is not about easing the plight of women and the oppressed; rather it is focussed on fighting against imperialism. These “revolutionaries” are truly blinded by their devotion to that very destructive cause, and I’m pleased to see that at least one of them has fessed up.

h/t to Terry Glavin and to Kate.

Since the collapse of the Soviet Union, which revealed not only the economic failures of the totalitarian socialist state but also the censoring, imprisonment, and even execution imposed on it’s own dissenters, the left has had to turn elsewhere to find a “struggle” to champion. The latest socialist poster boy is Hugo Chavez.

Judy Rebick writes:

I am not crazy about Chavez cadillio style of leadership but Venezuela is alot more democratic than Canada. … As you will read in Transforming Power, we should be studying Venezuela to see how we can deepen our democracy but instead in a throw back to the cold war, our media paints Chavez as a autocratic and a right-wing populist manipulating the people. I’ve been to Venezuela and the people there understand exactly what they like and don’t like about Chavez.

Chebama T – All the cool kids are wearing them

Sunday, August 16th, 2009

Chebama T

Available here.

Related:

Houston Obama campaign office manager hangs a Che Guevara Cuba flag behind her Obama campaign office desk.

Houston Obama campaign office manager hangs a Che Guevara Cuba flag behind her Obama campaign office desk.

“Useful idiot”: Oliver Stone

Friday, August 14th, 2009

In honour of the Soviet KGB defector, Yuri Bezmenov I bring you Oscar-winning film-maker Oliver Stone:

Stone and Chavez

Oliver Stone will continue his infamous tradition of films about real-world political figures with a new documentary about Hugo Chavez, the flashpoint Venezuela president whose influence the United States has publicly tried to subdue in recent years.
The news comes after Stone blithely weathered the fallout from his breezy Bush biopic W. and a wave of publicity after the Iranian president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, turned down his request to make a documentary about him. (Ahmadinejad acknowledged Stone’s rebel status in his profession but said he was still part of “the Great Satan,” to which Stone famously said he hoped that the Iranian “experience with an inept, rigid ideologue president goes better than ours.”)

True to form, Stone will focus his Chavez documentary on the leftist president’s vast opposition, and he will have plenty of material: Chavez recently introduced legislation that would allow him to remain in office until 2019. Stone has already spent considerable time with Chavez over the last several months, and his film is slated to be finished this year.

Source.

Stone’s project is also discussed by Oleg Atbashian:

Thus, Oliver Stone is reportedly making a documentary about Hugo Chavez, whom he describes as an “energetic, principled champion of change in Latin America” and hopes, in Stone’s words, to “capture the spirit of his drive to roll back U.S. influence.” The ability to claim originality while working for decades from the same moth-eaten template makes Mr. Stone an Oscar-winning genius. Is there a chance that in the process of glorifying what he calls the region’s “liberation from the United States,” the legendary director might display authentic originality by interviewing, not a leftist, but a hero of anti-Marxist resistance? Can the devastation inflicted on Latin America by socialist policies persuade Mr. Stone to look beyond the worn-out clichés? We can only wish.

Source.

“Useful Idiot”: Chris Matthews, MSNBC

Tuesday, August 11th, 2009

In honour of the Soviet KGB defector, Yuri Bezmenov I bring you MSNBCs Chris Matthews:

Chris Matthews

In a shocking video on MSNBC, host Chris Mattews suggested that the ‘Obamacare’ protesters should be injected with sodium pentothal until they admit they’re racists.

Source.

And below is an astonishing video clip of Matthews Lawrence O’Donnell in his full glory interviewing Peter Schiff last week:

—–

Correction: I had mistakenly identified MSNBCs Lawrence O’Donnell as Chris Matthews in the clip above. I therefore have to award them both “useful idiot” designation.

Iran: Conflicting views from the Left

Friday, July 24th, 2009

Muhammad Sahimi provides an insightful historical perspective on the political situation in Iran:

Iran’s rigged presidential election of June 12, 2009, has given rise to a very odd phenomenon. Some supposedly leftists and progressives in America have adopted the view that the Iranian election was not rigged. They believe that the Iranian reformists have not been honest about the election (they say the reformists knew they would lose). They allege that the demonstrations in Iran against the rigged election are mostly the work of Western intelligence agencies stirring up trouble. In taking such a position, these so-called leftists and progressives have firmly sided with Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and Iran’s Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.

Source.

The “very odd phenomenon” observed by Sahimi is not terribly surprising. As I have argued, the radical left is not motivated by the ideals of democracy and human rights – they are fighting capitalism and American Imperialism. “The enemy of my enemy is my friend”, and the left is willing to turn a blind eye to the people of Iran in the administration of this fight.

The Hypocrisy File – It’s not bad if liberals do it.

Thursday, July 23rd, 2009

Let’s just imagine for a moment, the outcry and the venom that would come from the NDP if a U.S. Republican leader were to embark on a cross-Canada crusade in the midst of a national Canadian policy debate. Jack Layton has stated that he is doing just that – in the United States. He is off to defend the honor of Canada’s socialized health care system, and spread the gospel according to Jack.

Visit msnbc.com for Breaking News, World News, and News about the Economy

Apart from the obvious hypocrisy of this political meddling south of the border, one has to wonder what’s in it for Layton? I also have to wonder why Jack is not spending his time dealing with the many issues of national concern, right here in Canada.

But this is Jack Layton, of course.

How’s that new diplomacy working out Barry?

Thursday, July 16th, 2009

While rejecting any compromise in Iran’s nuclear dispute with the international community, Ahmadinejad had said that the government would adopt a tougher stance toward the West during his second presidential tenure and force it to accept Iran’s positions.

Source.