Archive for August, 2009

America, I thought we were friends?

Saturday, August 29th, 2009

While the domestic policies of the Obama administration have been dominating most of the headlines since his inauguration, raising very real concern and even dissent at home, foreign policy has quietly been taking shape behind the scenes. While Americans focus on the spectacle of a ballooning deficit as it’s government has taken unprecedented steps to control of the banking, automotive, and healthcare sectors, other countries have been asking the question “What does this administration mean to us?”

A month ago, the heroic leaders of Eastern Europe got down on their knees and begged Obama not to renege on George W. Bush’s promise to give them a missile defense system and not to give in to Russian threats and remonstrations, which were obviously designed to keep the former Soviet slave states within Russia’s imperial reach. Having seen Russian tanks rolling into Georgia, who can doubt that the Putin regime has long-term goals of reacquiring the “sphere of influence” that brought so much terror and loss of life to Eastern Europe just a few decades ago?

Source.

With the financial means to exert meaningful influence on the international stage now significantly compromised by out-of-control domestic spending programs, combined with this administration’s apparent desire to apologize for past “American imperialist sins”, historical Western allies do have reason for concern.

—-

Update: Eastern European concerns go unheard:

WARSAW, Poland – Poles and Czechs voiced deep concern Friday at President Barack Obama’s decision to scrap a Bush-era missile defense shield planned for their countries.

“Betrayal! The U.S. sold us to Russia and stabbed us in the back,” the Polish tabloid Fakt declared on its front page.

Polish President Lech Kaczynski said he was concerned that Obama’s new strategy leaves Poland in a dangerous “gray zone” between Western Europe and the old Soviet sphere.

Source.

The myth of “free” healthcare in Canada

Friday, August 28th, 2009

One of the barriers faced by proponents of healthcare reform in Canada is the popular notion that healthcare in this country is “free”, or at least inexpensive. One of the reasons for this misconceptions is that Canadian clients of healthcare services are rarely ever presented with a bill for the services they receive under the government plan. Unlike virtually every other exchange of services in Canada, healthcare is shielded from the vulgar connection between providing a service and revealing it’s cost. Healthcare services are rendered to Canadians and the bill is never seen by those receiving the service. Not only are Canadians not able to check the bill for accuracy and confirm that services were indeed rendered, but they are denied insight and appreciation for the real cost of the care they have received.

In my view this lack of transparency can only contribute to a reduced regard for fiscal prudence on the part of patients, and an opportunity for error and abuse on the part of healthcare providers.

This lack of transparency is not only present at the point of service delivery, it is also very absent in our taxation system. Canadians are generally in the dark regarding how much of their own money is spent on healthcare services, and believe me: it isn’t free.

An recent article Nadeem Esmail does a nice job of breaking this down:

So how much do we really pay as individuals and families for our Medicare system?

In order to determine a more precise estimate of the cost of public health care insurance for the average Canadian family in 2008, we must determine how much an average family is expected to contribute in taxes to all three levels of government. The percentage of the family’s total tax bill that pays for public health insurance is then assumed to match the share of total government tax revenues (including natural resource revenues) dedicated to health care (22.6% in 2007/2008).

Looking at common family types, this calculation finds that the estimated average payment for public health care insurance in 2008 was:

- $9,572 for the average 2 adult family

- $9,855 for the average 2 adult and 1 child family

- $10,191 for the average 2 adult and 2 child family

- $3,484 for the average unattached (single) individual

It is critical to recognize that these estimates count only the direct costs of Medicare. They do not count administrative costs subsumed by other government departments that support health care through activities such as tax collection, or other privately borne costs related to the financing and operation of Medicare such as tax compliance or the private burden of waiting for health care.

Source.

—-
Related: After writing this post I came across this recent account of a visit to a major Toronto hospital and I was left wondering if the patient was ever informed of the charges related to that visit. And the logical next question would be “Did the patient feel they had received good value for those costs?”

David Horowitz – “No prisoners”

Thursday, August 27th, 2009

I’m just finishing the David Horowitz autobiography “Radical Son“, and as I make my way through page after page of historical references that have shaped the last 70 years of political and cultural activism in the west, I can’t help thinking how important this book is. Even though the book was written 12 years ago, many of those among his cast of characters are very much a part of the political landscape today. Perhaps more importantly, the forces that shaped these characters remain as strong as ever.

If you haven’t already done so, you really should read this book.

David Horowitz recently turned 70. Below is a video from his birthday celebration and “roast”. There are some excellent clips of some of his admirers that spoke at the dinner, but hearing him speak of his own journey is certainly the highlight:

A remarkable admission from the left

Friday, August 21st, 2009

The following point cannot be stressed enough; whilst the U.S. remains in Afghanistan, economic and social development will not occur much beyond current levels. This in turn means that the Taliban, as a broad-based movement of poor farmers and lower clergy, is the face of anti-imperialist resistance in Afghanistan for the foreseeable future.

To put it another way, if we, as avowed anti-imperialists, intend to wait around for a resistance movement that agrees with us on every issue, including the need to fight the oppression of women, gays, racial and religious minorities, etc., we’ll be waiting a long time. The Taliban is the resistance in Afghanistan and we must support it, critically, but unreservedly.

Source.

In previous posts I have wondered out loud about the silence of the left on issues of women’s rights and democratic reform in the middle east and elsewhere, and I have always maintained that the real struggle of the radical left is not about easing the plight of women and the oppressed; rather it is focussed on fighting against imperialism. These “revolutionaries” are truly blinded by their devotion to that very destructive cause, and I’m pleased to see that at least one of them has fessed up.

h/t to Terry Glavin and to Kate.

Since the collapse of the Soviet Union, which revealed not only the economic failures of the totalitarian socialist state but also the censoring, imprisonment, and even execution imposed on it’s own dissenters, the left has had to turn elsewhere to find a “struggle” to champion. The latest socialist poster boy is Hugo Chavez.

Judy Rebick writes:

I am not crazy about Chavez cadillio style of leadership but Venezuela is alot more democratic than Canada. … As you will read in Transforming Power, we should be studying Venezuela to see how we can deepen our democracy but instead in a throw back to the cold war, our media paints Chavez as a autocratic and a right-wing populist manipulating the people. I’ve been to Venezuela and the people there understand exactly what they like and don’t like about Chavez.

Ouch! Dig deeper, Ontario

Tuesday, August 18th, 2009

Today it became public that Hydro One has asked the Ontario Energy Board for permission to raise the cost of distribution to all Ontario customers an average of 9.5% in 2010 and 13.3% in 2011 to cover $266 million dollars in costs relating to their four year Green Energy Plan for 2010 to 2014. By 2011 the impact of this $266 million will be an average increase of 24.3% over two years on the delivery portion of every Ontarian’s hydro bill. Because each public utility is a customer of Hydro One, it doesn’t matter who sells you your electricity – this impacts you.

In February 2009, George Smitherman told Ontarians that the cost to implement the five billion dollars of investment Ontario is expected to make in renewable energy as part of the Green Energy Act would result in an annual increase of approximately 1% per year on the average hydro bill.

Source.

h/t to Kate.

Ontario Schools – An non-level playing field

Monday, August 17th, 2009

A couple of weeks ago I met with a friend of mine who has taken on the very challenging task of creating a new business – a new business that would create employment in her community and provide a very worthwhile and needed service. Sheileen is starting a new private primary school.

The reason we were meeting was to see if I might be able to offer any advice to help her market the new school.

Talking to Sheileen and listening to her describe her vision and her dedication to education convinced me there certainly was a place for her new offering in the education market in her area – Toronto. Sheileen has years of experience as both a teacher and as an education administrator, in fact she had run her own successful school (at the high school level) in the past.

The challenge Sheileen faces, however, is that the “market” for education does not come close to resembling a true competitive market. The Ontario government fully funds public and Catholic primary and secondary education through general taxation. In other words, whether you have a child enrolled in a publicly funded school or not, you’re already paying for it. If a parent choses to send a child to an independent school they have to pay for it on their own. This is hardly a level playing field when it comes to education, and this is also discriminatory:

Against the backdrop of this obvious inequity, the United Nations’ Human Rights Committee issued a report in 1999 criticizing Ontario’s educational policy as blatantly discriminatory. The committee recommended that Ontario either extend public funding to all independent schools irrespective of religious orientation or withhold such funding from all such schools.

Source.

This has long been a concern of parents who choose to enroll their children in independent schools, and has made it very difficult for independent schools to compete fairly for students.

And now, as if the financial disadvantage wasn’t enough, the Ontario Government has introduced another way to discourage parents from choosing an independent education option for their children:

Ontario will start requiring high school credits and grades received from private schools to be flagged on student transcripts with the letter “P” starting this fall.

Education Minister Kathleen Wynne confirmed Tuesday that the move was in response to public concerns that some private schools were providing “easy marks” for a fee. Such fees can run up to $2,000 for a three-week summer Grade 12 English course.

Source.

So because “some private schools” are not upholding adequate standards, the government will flag ALL private school grades with a “P”. Instead of identifying and dealing with only the offending schools, the government will stain the reputation of all private schools.

This is clearly an unfair policy, and I believe it is more about boosting public school enrollment than it is about “improving transparency”.

So what advice can I offer Sheileen? What marketing angle or creative campaign could possibly overcome these very real obstacles to success? I will continue to ponder that one.

——-

To learn more about Sheileen’s new school, please visit:
www.alderwoodtoronto.ca

Chebama T – All the cool kids are wearing them

Sunday, August 16th, 2009

Chebama T

Available here.

Related:

Houston Obama campaign office manager hangs a Che Guevara Cuba flag behind her Obama campaign office desk.

Houston Obama campaign office manager hangs a Che Guevara Cuba flag behind her Obama campaign office desk.

Quote of the day: Hillary Clinton

Sunday, August 16th, 2009

“I am sick and tired of people who say that if you debate and you disagree with this administration somehow you’re not patriotic. We should stand up and say we are Americans and we have a right to debate and disagree with any administration.”

Hillary Clinton, 2003

The Hypocrisy File – It’s not bad if liberals do it.

Saturday, August 15th, 2009

kill_bush1

I find it so strange, that after years of the most vitriolic hate expressed toward any US president in history, that the media would suddenly discover new and imminent threats of terrorism and danger directed at Barak Obama. During the Bush years, where open calls for the death of Bush-Hitler, celebrations of his death in the arts, and internet hate-mongering on a scale never before witnessed (for 8 whole years) … the press and it’s herd of shadowy “experts” seldom, if ever, expressed concern for the safety of Bush.

Source.

h/t to Kate.

Update: Here’s short video that touches on some of the misinformation and hypocrisy coming out of the Obama camp.

Quote of the day: Pamela Geller

Saturday, August 15th, 2009

The left should be warned: The libelous smear of racism has lost its sting. If everything is racism, then nothing is. The charge has lost its power. The more that leftists pull this evil trick, the more folks will shrug. The sad and terrible thing is that by using this tactic, the left has obscured the true evil of genuine racism. The fact is, when the left makes everything about race, and sees everything through a prism of “racism,” it shows us who the real racists are.

Pamela Geller, August 6, 2009