Archive for April, 2009

Quote of the day

Thursday, April 30th, 2009

Right now, Barack Obama is behaving like Santa Claus. He is making all kinds of promises he will never be held to account for because they don’t come due until the next generation.

He’s basically able to take credit for things that he has not accomplished and will not accomplish — with no responsibility for actual outcomes. If, in fact, he were around 20 years from now where you could see the consequences of a national healthcare system or the inflation resulting from his massive deficit spending or the international dangers growing out of his unilateral disarmament, if you will, in various aspects of our national security, then I think his numbers would be lower.

Mark Levin, author of Liberty and Tyranny: A Conservative Manifesto

“What is the conservative movement in one word: freedom”

Wednesday, April 29th, 2009

In my previous post I wrote about my favorite session at the Manning Networking Conference in March. My second favorite session was a panel dealing with conservative intellectual capital. John Turley-Ewart (Editor for National Post) and Scott Reid (Conservative MPP) provided some interesting historical and scientific food for thought.

I highly recommend watching it here.

“Is principled politics possible?”

Wednesday, April 29th, 2009

In an earlier post I reported on the Manning Networking Conference I attended back in March. My favorite session was a panel discussion featuring Bill Robson (C.D. Howe Institute), Ken Boessenkool (GCI Canada) and Andrew Coyne (Maclean’s). Andrew Coyne was in a particularly feisty mood that day and as he said, he “likes to annoy the crowd he’s with.” He particularly annoyed Ken, and it made for some refreshing and very candid exchanges.

You can watch it all on the CPAC site:

Andrew Coyne

Well, he did promise change

Tuesday, April 28th, 2009

Separately on Monday General Motors Corp. said it will be at least half owned by the U.S. government under a plan to slash its debt and cut dealer ranks nearly in half.>

Source.

Quote of the day

Friday, April 24th, 2009

On the 9/11 “Truth” movement:

Across North America (never mind Europe and North America), millions of people have decided that the leaders of the free world are actually murderers — or, at least, in league with murderers – who’d wantonly slaughter thousands of their own citizens as a means to advance a geopolitical agenda. Isn’t that something that should interest us?

Jonathan Kay, April 23, 2009

Quote of the day

Monday, April 20th, 2009

Imagine, if you will, every decision made about your personal motor vehicle — from the gas you put in it to the recommendations the mechanic makes for fixing your worn-out brakes or broken transmission — was subject to final review by a state bureaucrat with no experience in the automotive industry. Now extrapolate that scenario to your health care. Are you concerned yet?

Even if the judges of the 11th Circuit disagree with the appellants’ argument, the fact that three states are currently in federal court seeking official validation of their “right” to overrule physicians and arbitrarily ration medical care is frightening enough.

When government is given free rein to overrule a medical professional’s judgment of care based on their analysis of cost, physicians and their patients no longer have a role in making decisions about those patients’ care.

Jeff Emanuel, April 20, 2009

Signs of progress in Afghanistan

Saturday, April 18th, 2009

I am getting very tired of hearing the naysayers repeat the familiar and lazy chorus that the culture of oppression in Afghanistan “will never change”. These same naysayers like to question whether we in the west have any business “exporting” our values and “imposing” them on a foreign land.

These arguments provide a convenient way to help justify pulling out of Afghanistan, turning our backs on a country that has demonstrated a real desire to join the ranks of free and democratic countries.

I do agree that change must come about from a desire within Afghanistan, and it’s apparent that this desire is very much alive and well:

When I lived in Kabul, women simply did not rise up, take to the streets, and mount brave demonstrations. Hell no. Wealthy women wore decorous long headscarves, long coats, and gloves, and were driven around by chauffeurs in expensive European cars. Poor women wore the full burq’a and were forced to sit separately from men on public buses; they were also kicked to the back of the line in the bazaar when the male servants of wealthy families came to make their purchases. Occasionally, if a country girl or woman was out working or walking and a male non-relative chanced by, she would swiftly, shyly turn her face away and simultaneously cover it with her headscarf. This was a practiced, perhaps terrified motion.

Imagine my joy today, nearly fifty years later, when I read that Afghan women just took to the streets to protest a new law which legalizes rape within marriage, requires a husband’s permission in order for his wife to be able to work, and requires wives to “dress” as their husbands desire.

Source: Phyllis Chesler, April 16th, 2009

Human Rights Commissions: Useful or Obsolete

Thursday, April 16th, 2009

I’m sorry I wasn’t able to make it to London earlier this week to see the speakers discuss the Canadian Human Rights Commissions and the many ways it’s out of sync with our society.

But thanks to “Lumpy, Grumpy, and Frumpy“, and the wonders of the Internet, we’re all able to watch the video:


Human Rights Commissions: Useful or Obsolete? Part 1: Intro & Kathy Shaidle from josephinejosephine on Vimeo.


Human Rights Commissions: Useful or Obsolete? Part 2: Salim Mansur and Ezra Levant from josephinejosephine on Vimeo.

Yes, I take requests

Wednesday, April 15th, 2009

From my good buddy Jeff on the U.S. financial mess:

http://www.thomasewoods.com/

Heard this guy go on for an hour about the recent collapse of the US and how it came about, flattening myths left and right, on Financial Sense News Hour this weekend. The absolute best summation I’ve heard yet.

Audio link to that is here:
http://financialsense.com/Experts/2009/Woods.html

But this link below to a 50 minute speech is as good as Schiff. Funny, but poignant as hell, as he details the 1920 depression that lasted only a year or so.

Why? Because Harding didn’t do anything. It’s the best case I’ve heard for keeping the government small and keeping its hands out of the free market.

A good YouTube video post maybe on your site too.

Quote of the day

Wednesday, April 15th, 2009

To reduce modern climate change to one variable, CO2, or a small proportion of one variable – human-induced CO2 – is not science. To try to predict the future based on just one variable (CO2) in extraordinarily complex natural systems is folly. Yet when astronomers have the temerity to show that climate is driven by solar activities rather than CO2 emissions, they are dismissed as dinosaurs undertaking the methods of old-fashioned science.

Professor Ian Plimer, Heaven And Earth, April 15, 2009