Archive for January, 2009

“Splenetic” – what a neat word

Thursday, January 29th, 2009

John Ivison does a nice job of putting some context around the federal/provincial wrangling that has once again erupted, this time inspired by the recent budget.

In Mr. Harper’s Old Testament view of the world, he needed to get even and in Tuesday’s budget he did. Newfoundland and Labrador is now the second richest province in Confederation, on a per capita basis. It no longer receives equalization payments as a “have” province but because of two separate deals known as the Atlantic Accords it still receives “offset” money – in reality, bonus cash aimed at helping transition from “have-not” to “have” status.

Over the next three years, those payments were expected to total $2.5-billion but, without warning or explanation, the budget cut that number by around $1-billion. There’s no doubt that this violates the Atlantic Accords or that the manner in which the changes were communicated was conduct unbecoming a federal government.

But these are strange days and, to borrow Mr. Williams indelicate phrase, the fact is that it was the taxpayers in the rest of Canada who were getting the shaft under the old arrangement. The second richest province in the country was, de facto, continuing to receive equalization payments, even though it no longer qualified. It will still receive around $1.5-billion over the next three years when the offset payments run out — that’s $3,000 for every man, woman and child on the Rock. That is in addition to the $2-billion “signing bonus” the province got in 2005 for inking a second Atlantic Accord.

He goes on:

Given his electoral ambitions in the province, it was equally certain that Liberal leader Michael Ignatieff would offer words of sympathy for Mr. Charest. “It’s about fairness and equity in our federation,” he said.

Are these people sniffing glue? Quebec will get $8.3-billion of the $14.2-billion pot of equalization money next year, in addition to $5.7-billion in health transfers and around $2.5-billion in social transfers.

As Ted Menzies, the parliamentary secretary for finance, pointed out in the House on Wednesday, equalization payments to Quebec have risen 74% since the Conservatives came to power in 2006.

Source.

I’m feeling a little feisty today

Thursday, January 22nd, 2009

And there’s nothing like a little Ann Coulter to stir the pot:

When will the first reporter ask President Obama to admit that he has made mistakes? Try: Never.

No, that question will disappear for the next four years. It will be replaced by the new question for conservatives on every liberal’s lips these days: Do you want Obama to succeed as president?

Answer: Of course we do. We live here, too.

But merely to ask the question is to imply that the 60 million Americans who did not vote for Obama are being unpatriotic if they do not wholeheartedly endorse his liberal agenda.

I guess it depends on the meaning of “succeed.” If Obama “succeeds” in pushing through big-government, terrorist-appeasing policies, he will not have “succeeded” at being a good president. If we didn’t think conservative principles of small government and strong national defense weren’t better for the country, we wouldn’t be conservatives.

And why was that question never asked of liberals producing assassination books and movies about President Bush for the last eight years?

Say, did liberals want Pastor Rick Warren to succeed delivering a meaningful invocation at the inaugural?

The way I remember it, the Hope-and-Change crowd viciously denounced the Christian pastor, stamped their feet and demanded that Obama withdraw the invitation — all because Rick Warren agrees with Obama’s stated position on gay marriage, which also happens to be the position of a vast majority of Americans every time they have been allowed to vote on the matter.

Liberals always have to play the victim, acting as if they merely want to bring the nation together in hope and unity in the face of petulant, stick-in-the-mud conservatives. Meanwhile, they are the ones booing, heckling and publicly fantasizing about the assassination of those who disagree with them on policy matters.

Hope and unity, apparently, can only be achieved if conservatives would just go away — and perhaps have the decency to kill themselves.

Republicans are not the ones who need to be told that “the time has come to set aside childish things” — as Obama said of his own assumption of the presidency. Remember? We’re the ones who managed to gaze upon Carter at the conclusion of his abomination of a presidency without booing.

Source.

And on that final point about “the time has come to set aside childish things” I bring you the new Obama Chief of Staff Rahm Immanuel:


Hat tip to Kate.

CUPE asks that Israeli professors be blacklisted

Tuesday, January 6th, 2009

This news release really had me shaking my head:

CUPE Ontario to recommend support for ban on Israeli academics in response to Gaza bombings

TORONTO, Jan. 2 /CNW Telbec/ – CUPE Ontario’s university workers committee will bring a resolution to its annual conference supporting a ban on Israeli academics doing speaking, teaching or research work at Ontario universities as a protest against the December 29 bombing of the Islamic University in Gaza.
“In response to an appeal from the Palestinian Federation of Unions of University Professors and Employees, we are ready to say Israeli academics should not be on our campuses unless they explicitly condemn the university bombing and the assault on Gaza in general,” said Sid Ryan, president of CUPE Ontario. “It’s a logical next step, building on policy adopted by our provincial convention in 2006.”
Resolution 50, adopted in May 2006, supported boycotts, divestment and sanctions aimed at bringing about the Israeli withdrawal from occupied territories and a just peace in the region.
“Clearly, international pressure on Israel must increase to stop the massacre that is going on daily,” said Janice Folk-Dawson, chair of the CUPE Ontario University Workers Coordinating Committee, whose conference is scheduled for February. “We are proud to add CUPE voices to others from around the world saying enough is enough.”
Ryan and other CUPE representatives will join in the demonstration against the Israeli assault on Gaza at 2:00 p.m. tomorrow, Saturday, January 3 at Dundas Square in Toronto.

For further information: Sid Ryan, President, CUPE Ontario, (416)
209-0066; Pat Daley, CUPE Communications, (416) 616-6142

Source.

The suggestion that individuals must hold a particular opinion regarding a very complex and divisive issue, or lose their job is completely outrageous, and this public statement tells me all I need to know about the leadership of CUPE.

I would like someone to tell me when in history has any individual been singled out and asked to make a public statement of “outrage” based on their nation of origin? Sid Ryan has lost his mind.

Update: It looks like Hugo Chavez is getting in on the act, issuing this statement today:
“Now I hope that the Venezuelan Jewish community speaks out against this barbarism. Do it. Don’t you strongly reject all acts of persecution?” Chavez said. Source.

Quote of the day

Sunday, January 4th, 2009

How does a liberal or a leftist justify supporting a regime of religious fanatics whose ideology, when examined, is in complete contra-distinction to everything they claim they stand for?

Roger L. Simon