Archive for July, 2008

Of course the Liberals know what Canadians want

Friday, July 25th, 2008

For years Liberal leader Stephane Dion has been claiming that “Canadians do not want an election now” as an excuse for sitting on his hands during non-confidence votes. He was not acting in the interests of the Liberal Party, he was selflessly acting on behalf of the people of Canada.

What a nice guy.

Now it seems he’s determined that Canadians are ready for an election:

“We have seen over the winter and the spring more and more interest for federal politics,” Dion told reporters Wednesday at a hotel in Ottawa’s west end. “And more and more appetite for an election.”

Source.

Dion knows that the timing of an election is in his hands, and that one day he will have to bite the bullet and pull the plug, regardless of what the polls indicate. He has clearly decided that time has come and he is uneasy about appearing to be acting out of self-interest and is now turning up the rhetoric to claim he’s doing what’s best for Canadians.

I would like to see what polls he’s getting his information from. As far as I can tell, there really is never much of an appetite for elections in this country, except from the political parties that might benefit. To most Canadians an election is a necessary nuisance, kind of like a visit to the dentist.

At what point in history would you rather live?

Wednesday, July 16th, 2008

I have often discussed the question of whether or not things are improving on this small planet of ours, and I have often encountered the response “Things keep getting worse.” When I hear that response I will ask one simple question: “At what point in the history of this planet would you rather live?” After some back and forth debate on how we might measure “worse” we inevitably come to the conclusion that pretty much NOW is the best time to be alive on this planet. Which then makes me ask “Help me understand how things are getting worse for human kind? Life expectancy has increased dramatically, poverty levels and starvation levels continue to decline, and people have more freedom than ever before.” Of course I don’t mean to suggest there is not more work to be done, but the notion things are getting worse is simply not supported by the facts.

Historically, it is not through imposing limits but by transcending them that we have achieved truly remarkable progress. In the last century, although global population quadrupled, human wealth quintupled. Food production steadily outstripped population growth, and today we still produce enough to feed everyone on earth, and billions more. People starve because they can’t afford food – not because it doesn’t exist.

Human ingenuity has overcome resource shortages time and again, developing new technologies, using commodities more efficiently, overcoming scarcity and improving our living standards. The real question is why, given this historical record, we seem to have completely lost faith in our ability to keep doing this.

Source: March of the eco-imperialists

h/t to Kate (again)

Update: Graph showing Net US GDP from 1790 to 2007

“Voters Don’t Hate Attack Ads; They Hate Bad Ads”

Monday, July 14th, 2008

As an ad man myself, and as someone who has some experience working on political campaigns I read Vinny Minchillo’s piece in Advertising Age with interest, and I must agree with his view:

After asking about negative advertising, everybody wants to know about lying in advertising. Usually asked in the form of “Why don’t you guys ever tell the truth?”

Fact is, we’re obsessed with facts. If you tell a lie in a shampoo ad, your competitors file a protest and your ad might be pulled. Absolute worst-case scenario: Your client gets fined by the FTC. Maybe.

Tell a lie in a political commercial, and you could go to jail. Talk to somebody at another agency who is working for a third party supporting your candidate — even if you talk about golf and the weather — and you could go to jail. And we’re talking a real, live federal prison with stainless-steel toilets and a roommate named Spike.

We are highly motivated to tell the truth.

And then there’s the whole “I’m so and so, and I approved this message.” That doesn’t really happen, does it? It happens, or else. (See above regarding stainless-steel toilets.) Nothing goes on TV until the candidate personally signs off on it. That goes for positive spots as well as negative ones.

Source.

Green Shift = Redistribution of wealth

Saturday, July 12th, 2008

Not unlike the Kyoto accord, the Liberal “Green Shift” plan is much more about socialist-driven wealth redistribution than it is about any concern for the environment.

And this is not just me saying this, here are the latest words from Liberal MP Ken Boshcoff:

The Liberal Party’s Green Shift announced on June 19th marked the most aggressive anti-poverty program in 40 years. The ‘shift’ will transfer wealth from rich to poor, from the oil patch to the rest of the country, and from the coffers of big business to the pockets of low-income Canadians.

But of course the progressives/socialists will say “and what’s wrong with that?”

Source.

ht to Kate and Charles Adler.

If the Dion Green Shift does get through there is no doubt we will see some significant redistribution. As we saw in the late 70’s under the Liberal “National Energy Program” the oil patch will redistribute itself south and manufacturers will redistribute their capital to more tax-friendly jurisdictions.