Archive for June, 2007

It’s time for a majority government in Ottawa

Saturday, June 30th, 2007

I’ve often heard people suggest they like the idea of minority governments because they constrain the powers of the ruling party and force all parties to compromise. While the notion of “compromise” may sound appealing to some, when it comes to budget measures and legislation it often results in watered-down measures and pandering to special interest groups. Under the last Liberal minority we saw this exemplified in the “NDP Budget”, and more recently we’ve seen legislation get through parliament that contradicts the policy of the ruling Conservative party.

Andrew Coyne makes a strong case suggesting that minority governments are no way to run a country. Here’s an excerpt from Coyne’s column:

Senate obstructionism. Bureaucratic rebellion. Provincial expansionism. Native lawlessness. Quebec separatism. On this Canada Day, the question is perhaps more pertinent than ever: Is Canada governable? Or is the federal government descending ever further into impotence?
Some of this is simply the inevitable consequence of minority government, whose vulnerability invites exploitation. Some is the legacy of many years of one-party rule, a permanent Liberal establishment seeking to frustrate the Conservatives at every turn. (Remember the heat Stephen Harper took for musing aloud, just before the last election, about the constraints placed upon him by the courts, the bureaucracy and the Senate? Doesn’t seem so far-fetched now, does it?)

You can read the whole thing here.

Cherniak thinks the word “promise” is “charged language”

Friday, June 29th, 2007

Wow. Jason Cherniak has quite a low tolerance for how private media reports things, particularly when it’s a story about the Liberals. Here’s what he had to say recently:

I want to be clear that I am not complaining about the Tories and Liberals referring to the others as making “promises”. As political opponents, you have to expect charged language from them. The point is that our newspapers need to avoid subjective wording in their news sections. Everybody certainly has a bias, but such biases should not be “reported”, they should be on the opinion pages. Reporters have a duty to use objective language and let the readers decide whether they believe the politician.

Source.

As one of the comments in Jason’s blog points out Dalton McGuinty has created a situation for himself where the word “promise” has become dangerous.

Premier McGuinty made his bed and now, as they say, he must sleep in it.

“Daughter of the Nile” in Canada

Friday, June 29th, 2007

Michael Coren writes in today’s National Post about the visit of Gisele Orebi to this weeks symposium entitled “On The Front Line of Immigration, Terrorism and Ethno-Politics.”

“There are courageous Muslims who do resist but it is difficult and dangerous. There is an underground of Sharia law across Europe, with terrible treatment of women. This is combined with the threat of violence aimed at anybody who speaks out against what is going on. Censorship through fear. We even see this to a mild degree in Canada, an example being the attempt to stop me entering the country.”
The cause of Palestine, she emphasizes, is at its heart about the triumph of Islam. “Most of Palestine is in Jordan but we do not hear cries for Jordan to return land. This isn’t about the rights of the Palestinians but about the refusal to accept a non-Muslim state in the region. Palestine has become the fashion of the West, without them understanding the deeper issues of the conflict.”
Paradox wrapped around irony packaging hypocrisy. Untied by a brave and wise woman who wants only peace and justice but who is still being persecuted for what she is and what she says. A daughter of the Nile, a teacher for the world.

A winning campaign “in a bottle”

Thursday, June 28th, 2007

I’m guessing Labatt will be very pleased with the response they get from their online “Message in a bottle” campaign that invites Canadians to send a short note to our troops serving in Afghanistan.

labatts_mess_in_bottle.png

On Canada Day our troops will be receiving not only some heartfelt words of encouragement but also a supply of free Canadian Labatt’s Blue beer.

Well done.

Have a look at the microsite here.

Supporting our troops – and the mission

Tuesday, June 26th, 2007

In today’s “Toronto Star” Rosie DiManno writes a poignant column in support of the mission in Afghanistan. Here’s an excerpt:

The Afghan story isn’t exclusively and proprietarily about Canadian soldiers who have died. It’s about why the troops are there, what they’re hoping to accomplish, their efforts to secure a benighted country and extend the rule of law, the urgency of denying Al Qaeda the strategic foothold they once enjoyed. It’s about promises made at the very top of international leadership, by the United Nations and NATO, by custodians of redevelopment who said to Afghanistan: We won’t abandon you again.

Nearly six years after 9/11 – plotted in Afghanistan – the country is far from achieving what donor nations and military custodians had hoped. Reconstruction has been laggardly, corruption flourishes.

But those who demand quantifiable benchmarks to justify continued intervention also ignore salient evidence, all that’s been achieved by empowering traditional district councils, micro-credit funding of small businesses, schools built and reopened, vital thoroughfares constructed, irrigation systems repaired, national troops trained and mentored and Afghan currency stabilized. Those stories are under-reported because combat deaths and poppy production are so much more dramatic and easier to tell.

Afghanistan is far from guaranteed a stable future. The international mission to bring that country off its knees might very well fail.

But without Canadian troops there, providing such a large and integral fighting part of the NATO commitment, it’s more likely that embryonic future will die in utero.

Who’s the baby-killer now?

Source.

Coyne and “springer” on equalization

Friday, June 22nd, 2007

Andrew Coyne’s recent column on the kerfuffle over the Atlantic Accord and provincial equalization is worth a read. And in the “Comments” I found this not-so-little gem by “springer”:

WAC Bennett, when asked in an interview (which I remember like it was yesterday) about equalization, with his characteristically wry smile replied: “Ah, yes. That’s where Bennett writes the cheques in British Columbia, and Smallwood cashes them in Newfoundland.”

This same man, probably Canada’s most visionary political leader ever, finally lost his patience at a federal/provincial conference on the topic of “equalization”. He stated essentially that BC is a “have” province, and thus a net payer of equalization, simply because British Columbians elect good governments. He said BC has no more resource wealth or potential than does Quebec. But Quebecers do not elect good governments, and therefore it is a “have not” province and draws upon equalization paid by BC.

He said, in essence, that “equalization” subsidizes bad government, removing the impetus from voters to elect better governments.

He said that “equalization” would become entrenched, ultimately would divide the nation, and would undermine the economic prosperity of the country.

He then stormed out of the conference.

And Pierre Trudeau publicly called him a “bigot”, which in turn fired massive outrage in this province, and one of the worst outbreaks of calls for separation in BC I’ve ever seen.

Bennett was a realist, a pragmatist, a political genius, and a visionary extraordinaire the likes of which I’ve not seen since, bar none!

40 years later his words stand like a prophesy from on high.

BC endured 9 years of NDP leftwing ideological pinheads at the helm of government that reduced this province to an economic wasteland, and finally a recipient of equalization.

Thus proving, in spades, that people ultimately deserve the government they get.

BUT…

It was Canadians in other provinces of Canada who picked up the tab for our collective idiocy here in BC.

IOW, British Columbians inflicted their collective idiocy on the rest of the country.

Is that fair? Is that just?

No, not even remotely.

Had we here been forced to bear the entire brunt of our own stupidity, even if that led to the brink of bankrupt…and it almost did…I’d suggest we’ve have dumped the NDP clowns a lot sooner.

As the adage states: Necessity is the mother of invention.

Equalization effectively absolves the electorate of responsibility for their own political choices. It underwrites inefficiency, and it prolongs…apparently eternally…pain.

If we were to call it for what it truly is, “welfare”, then…assuming there’s any pride left at all in some regions of this country…leaders would run for office on the promise of getting their provinces off of the dole. IOW, they would promise good government that produces real economic results.

As opposed to, f’rinstance, tax breaks for one province literally paid for by two other provinces.

How the hell can a premier of any province stand up and boast about a “balanced budget” all the while 30% or even 40% of it, let alone so much as one penny, is paid for by other provinces???

This entire charade called “equalization”, a charade now no less than enshrined in our constitution, is beyond ridiculous and inane.

For all of it…

God help the Prime Minister who speaks out against it…’cause nobody else will.

As I like to say…

Canada, official motto: Average, and reasonably proud of it.

Well said.

Source.

Cars don’t kill people, bad drivers do

Thursday, June 21st, 2007

I must say that the latest pronouncement from Ontario’s Attorney General didn’t surprise me all that much. It’s fairly consistent with the prevailing trend that is seeing individual property rights eroded, and our freedoms diminished:

“If we can establish someone has parts and they’re juicing up their car — obviously for the purpose of street racing — then we can seize those vehicles,” Bryant said.

“We will seize it and you will never see it again. We will crush your car, we will crush the parts.”

Source.

This is not only a ridiculously unworkable suggestion, but it will do little more than punish law-abiding citizens who like to put after-market parts on their cars.

To stop street racing and the type of dangerous driving that many young people have been engaged in will require more than a knee-jerk, band-aid measure like this. We need much stiffer penalties for speeding and for dangerous driving, and we need better education that emphasizes the effects of dangerous driving on innocent victims.

Hat tip.

Our nation’s shame

Monday, June 11th, 2007

I was recently asked to explain why I joined the group “Canadians Against Anti-Americanism” on Facebook.

Here’s my response:

While traveling in my youth I noticed that fellow travelers from America were treated differently than myself and others. They were often harassed or at least not made to feel welcome. These individuals did not deserve any different treatment than the rest of us and I felt bad for them. Many Canadians wore the maple leaf on their backpacks not as a symbol of pride, but rather as a way to say “I’m not American”. That also felt very wrong to me.

As I’ve grown up here in Canada I’ve observed that anti-Americanism seems to have become increasingly acceptable. It has crept into our lives at so many levels that for many people it’s become “normal”. Kid’s are subtly fed it in their schools, our national broadcaster treats it as comedy, and our politicians use it to garner popular support. Rather than contributing to my national pride, for me it is a source of shame.

Simply put, anti-Americanism is wrong.

Timing is everything

Monday, June 11th, 2007

Policy is the best honesty

Wednesday, June 6th, 2007

If you ask any man-on-the-street what is the number one attribute they look for in our political leaders 9 times out of 10 the first thing they will say is “honesty” or “integrity”. It seems to be the missing ingredient that Canadians yearn for.

And how hard can it be?

McGuinty and this crop of Liberals have done a great deal of damage to the faith the electorate have in our democratic institutions, and that is tragic. It will take a long time to repair the damage and reduce the cynicism that’s out there.

Here’s a recent column from Andrew Coyne on the subject.

read more | digg story