Archive for April, 2007

Kyoto, Carbon Credits, and China

Tuesday, April 24th, 2007

I just learned that under the Kyoto accord “developing countries” such as China are exempt from certain significant provisions related to how carbon credits are exchanged. This means that one of the worlds largest polluters would not only be exempt from economic penalties for emissions, but they would in fact receive a significant amount of money from western “developed” countries.

This seems more than a bit odd to me, considering how much of our money is already being sent to China to buy so many products. It starts feeling like we will be subsidizing manufacturing in China.

The more I look at the Kyoto Accord the less it appears to be about global warming, and the more it looks like it’s about the redistribution of global wealth. This also explains why those on the left like it so much.

Let’s not forget that our very own Maurice Strong was the main force behind Kyoto back in the early 1990’s. Where is he and his investment money now?

China.

“We will not go negative!”

Tuesday, April 24th, 2007

Following the very effective Conservative TV campaign depicting Stephane Dion as indecisive and “weak”, Liberals, including Dion himself and Michael Ignatieff, lined up to declare that negative political advertising is little more than a smear campaign and that “we would never do that”.

I recall thinking to myself at the time “Yeah, right!” This is the same Liberal party that ran two national election campaigns based on the premise that Stephen Harper and the Conservatives have a “hidden agenda” and that Canadians should be “very afraid”.

So it did not surprise me at all to see this:

Liberal attack ads would blast PM for income-trust decision

But according to Mr. Dion these new ads will not be “negative” “attack ads” (remember, he said he would never do that). Instead the new Liberal ads will be “contrast ads”.

What was Mr. Dion saying about having never gone back on his word?

The ‘07 Quebec Election

Tuesday, April 17th, 2007

Since I took time off my blogging activities I have a bit of catching up to do. One of the big events I missed was the recent provincial election in Quebec in which Mario Dumont’s ADQ party surprised most pundits with his very strong 2nd place showing. “Most pundits”, but not this one.

The results of the election in Quebec are directly related to the work Stephen Harper has been doing over the past 18 months.

The election results had little to do with the personal popularity of any of the 3 Quebec leaders. In fact, if you look back about a year you’ll see that the separatist PQ under Boisclaire were comfortably heading for a majority win.

Harper’s achievement in Quebec over the last year has been to present Quebec – and the other provinces – with a renewed perspective on federal/provincial relations. Like it or not, the sovereignty option in Quebec no longer offers any significant advantage. Quebecers are now able to put that important debate behind them, and are now able to focus political attention to more mainstream issues, such as the economy and social justice.

In other words, Quebec elections are now more like elections in the rest of Canada. And voter turnout should be expected to fall, as there is much less at stake once the sovereignty issue is removed. Monday’s voter turnout was very close to a historic low. Andrew Coyne discussed this aspect of the election here but I think his assessment is incorrect.

Nik Nanos over at SES has written an interesting post that looks at the next logical progression of this development in Quebec. Let’s just say things look pretty grim for the Liberals.

You’re never too young to start giving

Saturday, April 14th, 2007

I would like to tip my hat to the very thoughtful and kind efforts of Cornell’s Nathan Hood.

You can read about Nathan’s work here:

Nathan has not only stepped up personally to help as best he can, but at his very young age he has discovered that raising your hand and saying “I want to help” can truly make a difference.

Well done Nathan. Dee and Steve – you should be very proud.

Here’s Nathan helping out at the 2006 Cornell picnic:
Nathan Hood with corn in Cornell

And here’s Nathan and dad Steve:
Steve and Nathan Hood at Cornell picnic.

The Case Against LCBO Privitization

Friday, April 13th, 2007

This McGuinty fellow is a hoot:

McGuinty argued that keeping alcohol away from underage drinkers was the key issue. He even suggested the recent Ontario Lottery and Gaming Corporation scandal was evidence that retailers shouldn’t be trusted with alcohol.

Source

Hat tip.

Grocery shopping in Poland.

The Keyes.ca blog is back

Thursday, April 12th, 2007

After a 10 week break from this blog I’ve decided to get my journal back up and running. Over the next little while I expect to be posting some reflections on my first foray into the political arena, along with some other random thoughts.

I look forward to getting back to it.